I watched The Last Samurai today and liked it muchly. I think I liked the movie more for its theme than for its actual story (which was also quite good, by the way). It touches on a couple subjects that I'd like to talk about separately in more depth...
Honor & Principle. The samurai lived and died with honor. They would prefer death rather than suffer the shame of defeat. That's what motivates a man to fight valiantly to the death for a cause he deems fit, which I find highly admirable. The stand against impossible odds always stirs something in me. Katsumoto expressed admiration for General Custer, but I can't say I feel the same way. I think the main difference is that Custer was an aggressor- if you're defending something underpowered, it's quite honorable; if you're attacking something shorthanded, you're a fool.
Also along the lines of honor, the movie had flashbacks of Algren's past, slaughtering Native Americans as a soldier of the US. At one point, Algren asks, "Doesn't every soldier have nightmares?" To which Katsumoto replies along the lines of: "Only if he is ashamed of what he has done." I thought that was one of the most profound exchanges in the entire movie. It's inevitable that soldiers die in battle. In war, I suppose it's kill or be killed, but fighting dirty or showing no mercy (i.e. to civilians) would probably leave you with a bitter aftertaste. Even on the battlefield, you should conduct yourself with the utmost honor, so that you'll have nothing to regret afterwards. Bushido, if you will- a strict warriors' code of conduct. Live by the sword, die by the sword.
Tradition vs. Progress. The movie highlights the eternal conflict between tradition and progress. There's nothing sadder than watching a way of life come to an end. But the end of a way doesn't have to mean the end of a people, I think. Progress is something that can't be stopped; it's as natural as human nature- the desire to be better than what you are now. And though old ways should never be forgotten, I think there are ways of honoring tradition that don't necessarily have to restrict change.
Times change, people change... society changes. And as surely as nations rise and fall, ways of life are swept away by the currents of time and replaced by new. Nothing can stay, nothing is permanent. But the now is special for right now. "Life in every breath, every cup of tea." It's in that brief, fleeting moment of the present, savoring an instant for all its ephemeral glory that happiness can be found. I think Katsumoto kinda hinted at that in his last words, "...they're all perfect." (Among numerous other interpretations...) The beauty of the cherry blossoms, everything at that instant overshadowed the imminence of his death; he was admiring how perfect things were now, despite the fact that it would all soon change. I think that's the essence of Zen... errrr, the general gist of one of the precepts at least. Anyways, I digress...
Are Samurai Really Extinct? From my understanding, the defeat of the samurai differed from that of the Native Americans in that it wasn't so much about the wholesale genocide of a people as it was about the passing of a lifestyle. So it wasn't like a bloodline had been ended. More "Last Emperor" and less "Last of the Mohicans," so to speak. But ya, I mean sure, we don't have guys walking around with swords on their belts these days, but I think the fact that the viewer classifies Algren as a samurai by the end of the movie suggests that the samurai were more than just a people but a mindset. Just as simply donning the armor and carrying the swords doesn't make you a samurai, I think taking away the swords and whatnot shouldn't "de-samurai" the samurai. (does that make any sense?) I mean, I guess it's not much consolation, but martial artists of today still honor bushido, the art of kendo is still around, and the notion of honorable death in combat isn't lost on today's soldiers. I think it's the ideas in your heart that underlie your actions that count. So yea, the samurai of the sword may have long since died out, but I think the way of the warrior still lives on.
Honor & Principle. The samurai lived and died with honor. They would prefer death rather than suffer the shame of defeat. That's what motivates a man to fight valiantly to the death for a cause he deems fit, which I find highly admirable. The stand against impossible odds always stirs something in me. Katsumoto expressed admiration for General Custer, but I can't say I feel the same way. I think the main difference is that Custer was an aggressor- if you're defending something underpowered, it's quite honorable; if you're attacking something shorthanded, you're a fool.
Also along the lines of honor, the movie had flashbacks of Algren's past, slaughtering Native Americans as a soldier of the US. At one point, Algren asks, "Doesn't every soldier have nightmares?" To which Katsumoto replies along the lines of: "Only if he is ashamed of what he has done." I thought that was one of the most profound exchanges in the entire movie. It's inevitable that soldiers die in battle. In war, I suppose it's kill or be killed, but fighting dirty or showing no mercy (i.e. to civilians) would probably leave you with a bitter aftertaste. Even on the battlefield, you should conduct yourself with the utmost honor, so that you'll have nothing to regret afterwards. Bushido, if you will- a strict warriors' code of conduct. Live by the sword, die by the sword.
Tradition vs. Progress. The movie highlights the eternal conflict between tradition and progress. There's nothing sadder than watching a way of life come to an end. But the end of a way doesn't have to mean the end of a people, I think. Progress is something that can't be stopped; it's as natural as human nature- the desire to be better than what you are now. And though old ways should never be forgotten, I think there are ways of honoring tradition that don't necessarily have to restrict change.
Times change, people change... society changes. And as surely as nations rise and fall, ways of life are swept away by the currents of time and replaced by new. Nothing can stay, nothing is permanent. But the now is special for right now. "Life in every breath, every cup of tea." It's in that brief, fleeting moment of the present, savoring an instant for all its ephemeral glory that happiness can be found. I think Katsumoto kinda hinted at that in his last words, "...they're all perfect." (Among numerous other interpretations...) The beauty of the cherry blossoms, everything at that instant overshadowed the imminence of his death; he was admiring how perfect things were now, despite the fact that it would all soon change. I think that's the essence of Zen... errrr, the general gist of one of the precepts at least. Anyways, I digress...
Are Samurai Really Extinct? From my understanding, the defeat of the samurai differed from that of the Native Americans in that it wasn't so much about the wholesale genocide of a people as it was about the passing of a lifestyle. So it wasn't like a bloodline had been ended. More "Last Emperor" and less "Last of the Mohicans," so to speak. But ya, I mean sure, we don't have guys walking around with swords on their belts these days, but I think the fact that the viewer classifies Algren as a samurai by the end of the movie suggests that the samurai were more than just a people but a mindset. Just as simply donning the armor and carrying the swords doesn't make you a samurai, I think taking away the swords and whatnot shouldn't "de-samurai" the samurai. (does that make any sense?) I mean, I guess it's not much consolation, but martial artists of today still honor bushido, the art of kendo is still around, and the notion of honorable death in combat isn't lost on today's soldiers. I think it's the ideas in your heart that underlie your actions that count. So yea, the samurai of the sword may have long since died out, but I think the way of the warrior still lives on.